HR department is elevating its intention to check up the payment scores of possible employees, actually counting this information. This thing makes for being the best foreteller of the behaviour your worker. This issue was took up by Kevin Drum as well. It makes weird situation for the workers, who has no work — I mean, you cannot increase your payment level untill you got the job. On other hand you cannot get the job untill your payment level is increased.

Slacktivist (and also Kevin Drum) wrote about that and concluded that it better to become it illicit. At firstI decided to agree with this. But… on the ptehr hand I keep the line, where the relationship of the employee and the employer are transparent and there are nothing dirty or unclear in it as well. The payment level is the most important thing for any business type occupation; when two or more persons are going to become partners, they also check the payment scores of reach other — or there will no any business cooperation. But this situation is really suspicious.

Keynesian tax policy that was applied in Asia in large scale was really successful. That policy has worked better than expected. Paul Krugman (and David Pilling also) written some words about that.

The means, which were saved up in the most of Asian nations or financial funds before crisis for preparing to that, allow them to distinguish between them and other western and European countries. Actually, joblessness is the real problem, and we all know that money exist to spend them, making the people’s life better and make policy mechanism to work. If there is joblessness, then the government should to provide people with job, so it means, using accumulated money as well. But let us be honest. If we spend a lot of money from state budget — then we spend a lot of money, there is no doubt; so very soon we can turn from defaulter to insolvent. The government exists for making right choices and resolving the conflicts; the government should not to let us go with the stream and depend on a situation. But the budget has to contain enough money. But, you know, people doesn’t care how do you get that money – you can adopt it at super-low interest rates or you can spend down saved up surpluses or you can just print it, it doesn’t matters. The important thing is to use all resources to do something useful. There is a huge difference between these two things – being embezzler and being insolvent. The government should not hope that the money may come from something like nowhere: it cannot be.

Ann Althouse declared recently about Daily Caller’s materials in her blog. She has written about the article in Daily Caller is really awful. So she decided to advice us to look through the article in Journolist. This is really text which is has to be read.

Let us to look closer on this problem. Daily Caller actually can reach the e-mail archive of the Journalist. So they cannot to find out something that will withstand slapdash analysis. They steal this letters, but what is after that? Jonathan Strong makes slowly misleading instead of just publishing the entire letters quote.

So, why conservatism’s supporters are in developing? What is the general meaning of this behavior (also I can ask about Andrew Breitbart)? Their methods are really dirty, but you cannot assert that they are not lying to themselves. I mean to members of their movement; it is really true. They basically do it through the mass-media. They actually do not respect their followers, a lot of lying and disinformation; it better to take them as respectable customers as well.

The subway is overcrowded a lot, but it is still weird to have this article about that here. It reminds me a story about those, who trying to take two places – it is disgusting. But the problem still stays, and I am trying to resolve it at least on half, so talking about undercapacity.

According to the most conservative estimates, Red, Yellow and Blue lines await extremely overcrowding as well. There is in store for one rail car on these lines about 100-120 persons, and it will be over 120 persons per one rail car on Orange line. That will be really anarchy.

It would be better to have 320 more cars to handle this huge amount of people. But Kubicek claimed in a recent presentation of board of subway directors, that the present finance expending plan makes no provision for such a case.

That decline of financial injections is one of the most stupid things I met for a long time. The subway was developed in 1970s, it really created a commotion at that days. Nowadays subway serves as transport artery for one of the biggest regions in this state. If you have a car, do not think that you do not care about subway, it is not true. Think about car-less person, who can not enter the overcrowded rail car of subway, then he goes and buys a car, and after all he drives near you and makes hard traffic. What if there will be a lot of such persons? We must press for allocations on these need or we will sink in the traffic sea.

As Kevin Drum claimed recently, the idea that spreading the Bush fiscal cuts could be disclosed, so why not? That idea, which was developed as help small businessmen, is not really that, which trying to seem. The real things are bigger than that; it is just a tip of the iceberg.

I am trying to convince, that you should not to believe, that idea is really the method of helping small businessmen is so important, as everybody think about that. Small businessmen are respectable men, I do not trying to say something bad about them. But this issue should not touch large businessmen as well! However, it does so as about actors and artists. But that is not the heart of the problem. As the matter of fact, you ARE rich person if you are a small businessman and you get a lot of revenue from your small business as well. You can say that about every rich person, if it is sportsman, or movie actor, or CIA director. I am trying to say that there is no anything special negative in this situation, small businessmen will always be in number of those who are liable to tax.

If you read this blog, you have noticed that I have claimed recently about effective finance boost and about reasons, which hinder it developing. I suppose that is basically can be the aspiration to become watchful about avoiding “waste” in the highest extent. Remember Gregory Simmons and also Jonathan Karl, about their hitting “The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act”, which is supporting by some ARRA projects, financing by it. This is really weird article. At first, there is a very little money (and other resources) included in this project, so I do not get it why is this event so loud. At second, people need to be steady for things like that, that is why they were informed about that before real thing happens. And one more thing: when the top leadership buys goods like these, it always has a legitimate promotional influence.

Several months ago Alec MacGillis claimed that so-called “wasting” of money can activate deactivated before that financial (and also other) funds that is why we can call it a real trouble for us. But that is not actually true. Barack’s Obama surroundings tried to make us believe that they all are true vigilantes and increased watchfulness for the “wasting”. But there is not so easy to in real life: it is almost impossible to expend money quickly and raise valuable projects. And if those projects supposed to be running if you want avoid “wasting” of money completely. Just look on any small private business and compare that with top leadership structures. In small private business you always will find “wasting” of money there that help get profit as well.

Spain won World Cup and Germany lost, so now it would be that economic system of Spain will feel acutely that Germany had experience on World Cup 2010. If Germany will increase deflation it will shake Spain’s common economic situation. Stephen Gordon developed a chart that shows us, how badly lives Spanish people.

Unfortunately, Spain is self-reliant country, so this economic collapse cannot cause a lot of monetary injections that could help Spain and stabilize its economy and strengthen its condition in European Union as well. If we compare Spain with some American state, for example, and fit this situation on it, then we also can notice that it would be very difficult for Spain to make people move from one place to another.

On other hand we have massive loss of value, caused by deflation, coming from Germany, if Spain was independent country. So, there will be less money, people will grow poorer, all import will reduce as well. Country will be aswim only because of germane tourists, which will arrive to Spain, make a lot of shopping, increase Spanish wine sells and make a lot of useful things for Spanish economy. Maybe, tourists from Netherlands will arrive too.

But now the situation is different. Germany almost dictates its will to Spain and sets Spanish economic situation as Germany needs. As for tax assessments, they will not getting anywhere as well. Somebody supposes that there is the plan of Spanish government to ruin its financial condition on its own. But I do not think so, because Spanish top leadership has controlled its budget activities all the time before that collapse. So I suppose that all things will be wrong until the situation is controlled by those who don’t want any enhances for it. It is simple, isn’t it?

The military outlay in Greece is real reason of negative situation with the budget in Greece. So, Tyler Cowen thinks that the recent deals with submarine “That Helped Sink Greece” actually cannot help Greece to handle this situation. As Greece slashes spending to avoid default, it hasn't moved to skimp on one area: defense. Greece is the large country; it really imports a lot of conventional weapons. There are only the United Arab Emirates, India, China, and South Korea behind Greece on amount of kind of conventional weapons importers in entire world. So, the military outlay in Greece is the biggest of gross domestic product in European Union as well.

The conventional weapon’s outlay is wasteful occupation in case of the country doesn’t require it at all. Military outlay is the thing that is properly understood from time to time. For example, let’s take magnetic levitation train that could run between Milwaukee and Chicago can seem wasting of the state budget, couldn’t it? But just imagine that this train is really exists – how useful it can become for all people! So, we cannot suppose this project as totally wasting of money and time. But the military resources cannot be useful if you don’t need it. An army takes a huge amount of money and cannot be useful. The expensive weapon just only requires maintenance spending and it is not useful as well. If you are using it – that is another question. But if you don’t use it – you cannot get any profit. So, some countries can find out the military outlay as a very expensive thing, it can be hard for them.

As Stephanie Vallejo declared recently, atmosphere that was created by Kerry and Lieberman brings down the deficit.

It looks like Senator John F. Kerry became able to reduce deficit by $19.000.000.000 (or about that amount) via his signing climate changing bill. That is information from Congressional Budget Office. Concerns are increasing that deficit, and this fact is one more evidence for those who support viewpoint about the legislation has unsteady politic gauge.
Senator John F. Kerry claimed recently about price politic on carbon. He meant that it better to owe this season and whole year for increasing legislation confidence, introducing energetic politic climate and control afore-mentioned carbon price gauge. Also he declared that hopes to have support from the politics which oppose deficit and things that increase deficit as well. These colleagues can be valuable allies on this field.

Actually, so-called “deficit hawks” still support deficit increasing in every sign over all; those who are less conservative, attack not so important places, which keep this problem in place where it is, but not enlarge it. Mass-media still report about that problem from different sides.

There is no anything perfect in our world. So, the recent earmarks restriction that were developed by National Congress for helping commercial companies, as we know at this day, has a lot of loopholes. Actually, Ron Nixon and Eric Lipton claimed that to NYT. It means that restriction can be avoided easily.

I am sure that this field is really inappropriate place for political changes and for world reformers like our politicians. Let us guess that you have made marginal constituencies, and each of them brings one representative to Congress; if also is business owner politic system for gaining money from politic elections and etc., if you reduced the situation degree in your organization, in that situation you can only get the Congress members who will fight for the interests that they need for. So that is the system of ours. Actually the main thing in these cases is to response to these local interests. How exactly politics will answer to these issues, so long you will have to go to organize the situation. This system is really overrated, so we need to think about what would be better for the world. Therefore I think that this situation with earmarks is actually precursor of some kind or anarchy.